Jelly’s something
Many are finding the Jelly to be a stickier app than expected. I think Jelly’s
So what is that is that something? When it comes to getting answers, Jelly is less authoritative than Google or Wikipedia, more primitive than Quora, and less integral than Twitter or Facebook.
I think Perez’s something is actually more of a nothing. What Jelly has going for is the de-emphasis of the activity feed and the absence of a navigational hierarchy that would lead you to a full history of questions and answers. If you swipe away a question by accident, then tough cookies, you can’t go back.
Fortunately humans are well equipped to deal with this, having years of experience in the real world in which life isn’t organized in menus or made editable. Regret something you said at a party last night? Bummer, you can’t scroll through the history of your voice utterances and delete it.
Now, what’s great about the internet is that it makes one’s history easily accessible. I can delete years-old photos on Facebook, search for a tweet I made weeks ago, or pull up a note I took in Evernote who knows how long ago.
But there’s a tradeoff, and as Snapchat has shown, people feel unburdened by apps that don’t attempt to recreate a rich, deep history every time you fire up the app. Of course Snapchat, Tinder and Jelly are storing most everything on their back end, but from the point of view of end users actually using the app, after you do something, most of it goes away. Even if it’s just an illusion that things are lost to the ether, it’s a refreshing experience in the way it resembles the real world.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯

